A man should not pray with his head covered
New International Version Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head. New Living Translation A man dishonors his head if he covers his head while praying or prophesying. English Standard Version Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head, Berean Study Bible Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head. Berean Literal Bible Every man praying or prophesying having anything on his head dishonors his head. New American Standard Bible Every man who has something on his head while praying or prophesying disgraces his head. New King James Version Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonors his head.SEE VIDEO BY TOPIC: How to pray 4 Rakat (units) - Step by Step Guide - From Time to Pray with Zaky
SEE VIDEO BY TOPIC: Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.Content:
What is the Head Covering in 1 Cor 11:2-16 and Does it Apply to Us Today?
ESV - 5 But every wife who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head, since it is the same as if her head were shaven. Community answers are sorted based on votes. The higher the vote, the further up an answer is. A good answer provides new insight and perspective. Here are guidelines to help facilitate a meaningful learning experience for everyone. Follow Question.
What did the Apostle Paul mean when he said that "Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head," and "but every wife who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head"? Answers 6 Discuss. Shanna Duck "Let a search be made in the royal archives Since he's God's officer and somehow reflects God's glory on Earth, the man should not cover his head during worship.
The "head" of a wife is her husband, and women are the glory of humankind. For this reason women ARE to cover their heads the context here is during public worship. The covering represents her submission to her husband as well as possibly the human soul's submission before God. Verse 3 also shows that it is not degrading to be under authority, because Christ himself, although He is equal to the Father, is under the Father's authority.
Some authorities recently are arguing that the woman's headcovering was a symbol of HER authority I suppose, like a crown , rather than showing her submission to authority, but I have not found any historical support for this. Rather it seems to be quite plain. We Christians are to act in our ordained roles, so that the angels, some of whom left their ordained places, will notice.
It's clear from the historical record that women in the early church took these verses literally and wore veils, and these gradually changed to shorter veils, hoods, hats, bonnets, and finally to little lace mantillas. In the s, when I visited a Catholic Church in Mexico, women still were required to wear a mantilla in the building, and I think many women in the Orthodox faith still wear some type of covering today. As a fashion historian, I think the disappearance of the women's headcovering in most of the Church is an interesting study in how secular culture influences the church.
Women's headcoverings have almost disappeared, but I'd like to see a man try to preach or pray wearing a hat in most mainline denominations. There ARE today some issues about wearing head-coverings. Some people believe that the command was only for the 1st century, where a headcovering had a meaning that most people in the U. Today, a woman wearing a veil or scarf in public might be mistaken for a Moslem, an Orthodox Jewess, a cancer patient, or a member of a particular Christian denomination.
Some people also get very legalistic about the headcovering- some say it must cover the head and hair like a veil and others that, since the covering is itself a symbol and not according to scripture worn for modesty, then it can be much smaller: a wide headband, lace doily, decorative hat, a snood, or a back-of-the-head veil attached to a barrette. Some people, too say, that since we should "pray constantly," then the woman should always be wearing her head-covering. Of course, taken to its logical conclusion, this means that a man should NEVER wear a hat, since he's always to be in prayer.
The original context of the verses was in public worship, though. He gives his "frank answers" to more than ten of their questions. God in His Sovereign wisdom has included this Epistle in the canon of the Scriptures because the issues dealt with by the apostle are timeless.
The first half of the eleventh chapter of the Epistle discusses the matter of head covering. I urge you to go through verses 1 to 16 atleast thrice without prejudice before reading the comments below. To fail to cover their hair was thought to provoke male lust. Headcovering prevailed in Jewish Palestine and elsewhere, but upper-class women eager to show off their fashionable hairstyles did not practise it.
It is beyond doubt that the apostle took a positive stand in favour of headcovering. He gave atleast four reasons for his conclusion. First, the headship of God, of Christ and of man 1 Cor Secondly, he presents God's purpose of creation of man and woman v 9. Thirdly, he speaks of the angels who observe our worship and are concerned about God's order of administration in the Church v Remember, the archangel who rebelled against God's headship became Satan?
Lastly, Paul reminds us of "nature" v This verse implies that for a woman to have a headcovering in addition to her long hair is to say amen to the divine ordination. It is unwise to totally set aside the matter of headcovering as merely cultural.
Such an approach will ultimately discard so many precious New Testament passages as irrelevant. For example, the Lord's Supper, which is discussed in the second half of the same chapter, is essentially symbolic and it was also instituted in the Jewish cultural context! We must guard ourselves against losing the power of symbolism in Christian life.
Modern hairstyles and dress fashions are erasing the sex distinctions. Keeping the apostolic "traditions" will save us from a cataclysmic collapse v 2. Anyone who understands the trend of the age with the mind of the Lord will only urge for a conservative conduct in the House of God where men and women gather for worship Jer ; 1 Tim , Moreover, covering of head by women in the Church generally offends no one whereas if they don't cover, it does offend atleast some.
What do we lose by embracing an ancient symbolic custom upheld by the apostles? Eighty percent of Indian population is rural and this is the most unevangelised sector. Headcovering by women in villages as a mark of respect and reverence is deep-rooted in culture. Let's preserve it while planting Churches here. There are many sincere believers who hold an exactly opposite view in this matter of headcovering. The conclusion of Paul to his argument will help us maintain a spiritual unity in spite of such differences: "If anyone seems to be contentious, we have no such custom, nor do the Churches of God" v Lawrie Yinka Women don't cover their head with a hat or a piece of clothing these days because they believe in the understanding of the later part of 1 Corinthians which tells us that "the woman's long hair is given to her for a covering" if a woman has long hair, it is her glory.
However it is a dishonour for a man to have long hair. Dave Young it means what it says. Paul is referencing the fact that we must all recognize "headship" and for the woman this requires, according to scripture, that her head be covered when praying or prophesying.
It was taught and preached from the podium the importance of this command Bryan Naidoo founder and senior pastor of The Upper-Room Church It is just a pity that this subject has now become a major problem in the church of Jesus Christ. I say now because it was never a problem before. No theologian, scholar or layman ever asked to look at the latter part of the scripture on this subject, nor was there any debate regarding the covering of the hair.
This was not only practiced, but a command that the church adhered too. The question of woman having long hair has to do with the Glory of God, it does not evade the principle and order set in this chapter.
For if a woman will not wear [a head] covering, then she should cut off her hair too; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her head shorn or shaven, let her cover [her head]. For a man ought not to wear anything on his head [in church], for he is the image and [reflected] glory of God [his function of government reflects the majesty of the divine Rule]; but woman is [the expression of] man's glory majesty, preeminence.
If the hair is the covering why instruct a coveting. He also says a man ought not to cover his head. This means he must not place anything on top of his hair which is on his head. If this subject is examined carefully, a good scholar will find that this started to become a problem in the west where the fashion world was slowly creeping into the church. It is my belief that good men of God could not exercise godly principles laid down on the basis of fear. Congregants were looking for places where they will be comfortable, unfortunately the church had to bend or twist the word of God to to make its congregants comfortable.
The Idea in Brief
For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, for as much as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man. Genesis ,27 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth…. Genesis This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him;. Genesis Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.
T he subject of head coverings has been a source of much confusion for many believers in the Messiah. However, in this study it will be evident that the reason why it is a source of confusion is because of a lack of understanding as to its purpose. Many have written studies which examine historical data or various theories which attempt to explain the head covering issue. But we can learn why women should cover their heads and why men should not cover their heads simply by looking at the reasons given in 1 Corinthians and studying out those reasons in other scriptures. In the opening verses of 1 Corinthians 11, we see that Paul encouraged the Corinthians to imitate him as he imitates Yahushua.
There are several views in vogue on the text, but within evangelicalism three or four come readily to mind:. Hence, since this is not the tradition of the modern church, we hardly need to consider this text. Hence, the applicability today is that women should wear relatively long hair. Within this view are two basic sub-views:. This also involves the same two sub-views as 3 above. My own convictions are that that view 4 is correct. The sub-view within this that I adopt is the second one: women only need to wear some symbol when praying or prophesying publicly. Below is a brief interaction with the various views, including a critique of each. This view is easy to dismiss. A better case could be made from v 16, but only if one ignores v 2.
.SEE VIDEO BY TOPIC: Reciting Quran & Praying Salah with Shoes on, Not covering head while reciting Quran - Assimalhakeem